Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(11): 1026-1030, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35034053

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible effects of impact and loading on the metacarpal cartilage and hand functions in young elite athletes. DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study athletes with at least 3 yrs of sport background and who have been under a scheduled training program were enrolled. The second to fifth fingers' metacarpal head cartilage thicknesses were measured bilaterally by using ultrasonography. Handgrip and pinch strengths were measured. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire was also completed for every participant. RESULTS: A total of 42 male athletes (19 weightlifters, 23 volleyball players) and 46 healthy control subjects were enrolled. Metacarpal cartilage thicknesses of the athletes were thicker than those of the healthy controls (all P < 0.001). There were no differences between the dominant and nondominant hands (all P > 0.05). In the weightlifting group, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire work performance and pain scores were worse than the other groups (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of increased cartilage thickness measurements in the athletes suggests that sports activities might affect the metacarpal articular cartilage. Highest pain scores and lowest work performance scores in the weightlifters with highest metacarpal cartilage thickness might suggest that impact and loading during their sports play could lead to cartilage edema.


Assuntos
Cartilagem Articular , Ossos Metacarpais , Voleibol , Humanos , Masculino , Ossos Metacarpais/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Força da Mão , Atletas , Cartilagem Articular/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor
2.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil ; 67(4): 399-408, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35141479

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors of cervicogenic dizziness in patients with neck pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2016 and April 2018, a total of 2,361 patients (526 males, 1,835 females; mean age: 45.0±13.3 years; range, 18 to 75 years) who presented with the complaint of neck pain lasting for at least one month were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Data including concomitant dizziness, severity, and quality of life (QoL) impact of vertigo (via Numeric Dizziness Scale [NDS]), QoL (via Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI]), mobility (via Timed Up-and-Go [TUG] test), balance performance [via Berg Balance Scale [BBS]), and emotional status (via Hospital Anxiety- Depression Scale [HADS]) were recorded. RESULTS: Dizziness was evident in 40.1% of the patients. Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) was the most common etiology for neck pain (58.5%) and accompanied with cervicogenic dizziness in 59.7% of the patients. Female versus male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.641, 95% CI: 1.241 to 2.171, p=0.001), housewifery versus other occupations (OR: 1.285, 95% CI: 1.006 to 1.642, p=0.045), and lower versus higher education (OR: 1.649-2.564, p<0.001) significantly predicted the increased risk of dizziness in neck pain patients. Patient with dizziness due to MPS had lower dizziness severity scores (p=0.034) and milder impact of dizziness on QoL (p=0.005), lower DHI scores (p=0.004), shorter time to complete the TUG test (p=0.001) and higher BBS scores (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a significant impact of biopsychosocial factors on the likelihood and severity of dizziness and association of dizziness due to MPS with better clinical status.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...